Kathmandu. The art sector itself is in a dilemma as to who is considered a 'superhero' in Nepali art. No clear criteria, no process, no one has suddenly added the title of 'superhero', the question of how someone can be considered a 'superhero' has recently arisen in Nepali art.
For some time now, there has been a lot of discussion on social media about 'Mahanayak'. After actress and director Deepashree Niraula raised the question 'Is Rajesh Hamal a superhero?' In a television program, the issue has been discussed on social media.
Deepa's outrage with the superhero !!Rajesh Hamal
Some have been calling actor Rajesh Hamal a 'superhero'. But Deepashree Niraula questioned on what basis Rajesh Hamal became a 'superhero'. He had to face a lot of criticism for raising questions about Rajesh.
Deepashree had questioned how Rajesh Hamal became a 'superhero', saying that despite the crisis faced by the film industry due to Corona, Rajesh Hamal was not interested in playing a parental role.
After becoming a 'superhero', Deepashree wanted to be able to play a role in alleviating the pain of the film industry, otherwise the dignity of the title would end. Whatever the intention, Deepashree apologized after a heated controversy on social media.
Despite Deepa's apology, the issue could not be resolved on social media. Instead, the debate took precedence.
Some artists have even started making fun of those who are angry and do bad deeds by addressing them with the word 'superhero'.
Who is the superhero Why and how to call a superhero? What are the responsibilities and duties of a superhero? There is a wide-ranging debate on who will be given the title of superhero.
We have inquired with some celebrities of Nepali art about who is called 'Mahanayak' and how Rajesh Hamal was called 'Mahanayak'. We have questioned the basis on which Rajesh Hamal was called a 'superhero'. Presented, as is their opinion.
I don't believe in such titles
Madan Krishna Shrestha (Senior Artist)
There is a fear of getting into a controversy if you think about the superhero at this time. Let's not talk about it now. At this point, it is wise to say 'I don't know anything'. In Nepal, whoever does whatever happens, whoever is given any title. There is no standard for that.
I am also addressed by some titles including 'Comedy Emperor of Art'. But such titles do not touch me. The honor he has created is 'mahjodi'. It is not given by anyone. It is made by one's own effort.
The public has accepted it. We have kept this honor for 40 years by squandering it. I believe in this. I don't believe in the title given by others.
Whose superhero
Ashok Sharma (Senior Actor and Director)
When it comes to 'superheroes', we should also look at neighboring India. In India, actor Amitabh Bachchan is called a 'superhero'. The title was given by an agency through a public vote on the issue of "Who is the superhero?" He was also called the 'Great Hero of the Century' for a time.
After getting the title, the concerned artist also has some responsibility. Amitabh Bachchan fulfilled that responsibility by feeding and feeding about one and a half lakh technicians working in various genres in the Indian film industry during the Korana period, who were in trouble for a month.
This is just one example of the work he has done. He has a lot of such social work. He has been successful in the field of film and for the filmmakers there.
In the case of Nepal, the title of superhero is given by a person who runs a television program. I don't know if he is a person who gives titles like superhero to someone, superstar to someone.
The importance of a given position is differentiated from a survey through a process. Accordingly, the audience must have accepted. Not only superheroes, there are many titles prevalent in our film industry including Sadavahar, Meghastar and others, which are also lightly paused titles.
When Rajesh Hamal was given the title of Mahanayak. If the survey had been done at that time, surely Rajesh would have been the superhero. At that time, there was talk of Rajesh, the movie was playing, when Rajesh was there, the audience would run to the hall. The producer of his film did not drown.
Another thing is that a great hero is also an honorable title. Just like Madan Krishna Shrestha and Haribansh Dai have been given the title of 'Mahjodi' by the audience. It seems that they have worked accordingly. They are together as a couple in any genre of art.
Similarly, they are involved in every social work. They seem to have moved forward even when there was a disaster in the field of art. He has proved to be an ally of the dying and the screen for the arts.
Of course, I do not believe in such titles. We are artists You have to win the hearts of the audience by showing art. I think it is a great reward to be known for the role you have played.
Rajesh Hamal is the actor who has run the film industry at the same time. We must appreciate his contribution. Even if a person gives the title of superhero, even if the audience accepts it, the person who gets the title has some responsibility. Now there is an epidemic in Corona. Many people in the film industry are embarrassed. The 'superhero' is to save the dignity of the title by keeping himself active at such a time.
If a filmmaker is in trouble, he should be able to help him. Some filmmakers should be present when they fall ill or die. My opinion is that you should know how to show respect to your seniors and love your juniors. Isn't it a great hero to see a woman carrying a child on her back and walking many kilometers hungry in the wreckage of Corona? Did the audience make him a superhero or not? That is my question.
There is already controversy over the name of the superhero
Shanti Priya (Senior Color Journalist)
A 'superhero' is a person who has contributed to the commercial film industry for a long time by showing his prowess in film acting, pursuing success.
There was a lot of controversy over whether Rajesh Hamal was a superhero. Rajesh is definitely a person who has acted in many commercial films. He was seen at some point in the film from a small role to a major role. Is he a superhero or not? How superhero There has always been controversy over that. Therefore, it is more important to pay attention to how the public reacts than to say yes or no.
Rajesh has commercial films. But, not good. That is Rajesh's weak point. He has no memorable films.
This is the standard of 'superhero', it does not have to be this way. Rajesh Hamal has been given the title of 'Superhero' by one person. In my opinion, a great hero must have done something in the field of film till the end of his life. Whether it is acting, production or other.
Rajesh Hamal is a one-time 'superstar'. It is said that a superstar is a hit movie. This contribution of Rajesh is seen. Rajesh is not active in the film industry now.
Rajesh has been given 'Mahanayak' by a person through a program. Not everyone has to be a superhero. The important thing is whether the public has taken it that way or not.
It would be irrefutable if such an honor was given at the state level or by the Development Board, the highest body in the film sector. We give a lot of titles in the trend. In the past, it was customary to give a title from a king or a kingdom. That was valid for everyone. Now it is up to the individual to decide whether or not to recognize the title, whether he is proud of it or not.
It is better to sleep happily because the superhero is Rajesh
Deepakraj Giri (cast)
The 'superhero' is Rajesh Hamal. He should be called a 'superhero'. Let's not go on saying that he is not. It is good to be happy that the great hero is Rajesh Hamal now. I am silent on this issue now. However, there has been a lot of controversy.
The public does not want to hear anything about this. That doesn't make sense. Better a poor horse than no horse at all. The superhero is Rajesh Hamal, on today's date, yesterday's date and tomorrow's date. It is unknown at this time what he will do after leaving the post.
What is the work, duty and responsibility of a superhero? Who will separate it? That had to happen. He had to take the responsibility. Let's not go into the fact that Rajesh is not a superhero now. We have to say what the public wants to hear now.
This is not even an executive post. Is a figurative term. He who gives, becomes the great hero. Whether there are some criteria for this or not. If a person calls another person a superhero, he can also be a superhero. Everyone has this understanding. What is the job of a superhero? Some friends may have questioned that. But let's say the superhero is Rajesh Hamal.
I have given the title of superhero to Rajesh
Prakash Subedi (colorist)
Actor Rajesh Hamal has been given the title of 'Superhero' on the occasion of the 50th episode of the film related program 'Rajatpat'. When I gave this title at that time, I said that it was given for this reason. I forgot what those reasons were.
I had just gone to Kantipur TV to look for that program. Due to the earthquake, I could not find it. As far as I can remember, the title was given to the film industry at that time by covering the issues of rice industry alone for 10 years, non-partisanship and non-partisanship. At that time, there was no protest from anyone except actor Bhuvan KC.
Now the question has arisen as to who is the superhero. I think it is important to have a debate on this issue.
My idea is that the main point of all the titles including superstar and star is the business of film. Rajesh Hamal has played many films in the film industry for ten years. They have played small and big films with the same love. Such titles are the measure of his contribution.
At one time, the film could not run without Rajesh Hamal. At that time, if only his head could be placed on the poster, the audience would come to the hall. I think his behavior at that time was also observed.
Can Rajesh Hamal be called a 'superhero' now or not? This is a matter of debate.
Even before Rajesh, Bhuvan KC's contribution to the film industry is higher than others. However, from time to time some of the controversies surrounding him have become more prevalent. His good words were interrupted by controversy. Rajesh Hamal's film was once a good business. In that sense
No comments:
Post a Comment